"Mastering Maximum Flow: A Deep Dive into Ford-Fulkerson, Edmonds-Karp, and Push-Relabel Algorithms"

Introduction :

In today’s interconnected world, efficient data movement is the backbone of modern infrastructure. From routing internet traffic to managing transportation networks and optimizing supply chains, systems often face the challenge of managing flow. At its core, many of these problems can be modeled using network flow algorithms, which help us determine the best way to move resources (like data, vehicles, or materials) from one point to another while minimizing costs or maximizing throughput. Whether it's managing bandwidth in a telecommunications network or planning the most efficient shipping routes, network flow problems are critical to numerous industries.

One of the most prominent examples is internet traffic management. As data moves through networks, routers and servers need to decide how much data (or flow) can travel across various links without causing congestion. In this scenario, algorithms that determine the maximum flow from one node to another, while respecting constraints on the network, are essential for maintaining smooth operations. This is where algorithms like Ford-Fulkerson, Edmonds-Karp, and Push-Relabel come into play.

Overview

Network flow problems are a class of optimization issues where the goal is to push as much "flow" through a network as possible, from a source node to a sink node, subject to capacity constraints on the edges between nodes. These types of problems are highly relevant in both computer science and operations research, where maximizing efficiency is crucial.

• Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm is a greedy approach used to compute the maximum flow in a flow network. It iteratively finds augmenting paths until no more can be found, updating the flow each time.

• Edmonds-Karp Algorithm is a specific implementation of Ford-Fulkerson that uses Breadth-First Search (BFS) to find the shortest augmenting paths, improving predictability and efficiency.

• Push-Relabel Algorithm approaches the maximum flow problem differently, by locally pushing excess flow from one node to another and adjusting (or relabeling) node heights to guarantee flow moves toward the sink.

Each of these algorithms offers unique advantages and drawbacks depending on the network's structure and the nature of the problem. Understanding these algorithms not only provides insight into solving real-world issues but also reveals deeper connections in algorithm design, such as how graph traversal techniques and local optimizations can be leveraged.

Outline

In this blog, we will explore three key algorithms for solving maximum flow problems in network theory: Ford-Fulkerson, Edmonds-Karp, and Push-Relabel. Here’s a brief outline of what to expect:

• Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm: We will begin by diving into the basics of this classic greedy algorithm, exploring how it finds augmenting paths using Depth-First Search (DFS) and explaining its limitations.

• Edmonds-Karp Algorithm: Next, we’ll see how Edmonds-Karp improves upon Ford-Fulkerson by using Breadth-First Search (BFS) to find the shortest augmenting paths, making it more efficient and reliable for large graphs.

• Push-Relabel Algorithm: Finally, we’ll explore Push-Relabel, an algorithm that works by manipulating local excess flow and node heights rather than relying on augmenting paths, making it particularly useful in dense networks.

Section 1: Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm

What is it?

The Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm is one of the fundamental algorithms for solving the maximum flow problem in a flow network. It computes the maximum amount of flow that can be pushed from a designated source node to a sink node through a network of edges, each with a specified capacity. The algorithm is greedy in nature and is based on the idea of finding augmenting paths—paths along which additional flow can be pushed from the source to the sink, as long as capacity constraints allow it.

At its core, Ford-Fulkerson is built around the concept of residual capacity, which tracks how much more flow can be pushed along an edge. As augmenting paths are found, flow is added along those paths, and the residual capacities of the edges are updated. The process continues until no more augmenting paths can be found, indicating that the maximum flow has been reached.

How it works:

Ford-Fulkerson is relatively simple in terms of its approach, but understanding how it augments flow is key. Here’s a step-by-step breakdown of how it works:

1. Initialize Flow to 0
   Begin by setting the initial flow of all edges in the network to zero. At this point, no flow has been sent from the source to the sink, so the total flow is zero.

2. Find Augmenting Paths Using Depth-First Search (DFS)
   The next step is to search for an augmenting path from the source to the sink. An augmenting path is a path where the residual capacity of every edge along the path is greater than zero (i.e., additional flow can be pushed through those edges). Ford-Fulkerson typically uses Depth-First Search (DFS) to find these augmenting paths.

3. Augment Flow Along the Path
   Once an augmenting path is found, you can determine the minimum residual capacity along that path (the bottleneck capacity). Then, you “augment” the flow along that path by adding flow equal to the bottleneck capacity to all edges in the path. For every edge that the flow is augmented, the residual capacity is decreased by the amount of flow added, and the reverse edge in the residual graph is increased by the same amount (to allow for possible flow backtracking).

4. Repeat Until No Augmenting Path Exists
   After augmenting the flow along the current path, the residual capacities are updated, and the algorithm searches for another augmenting path. This process is repeated—finding paths, augmenting flow, and updating residual capacities—until no more augmenting paths can be found from the source to the sink. At this point, the current flow is the maximum flow.

Pseudo code:

{ 

function FordFulkerson(graph, source, sink):

    initialize flow in all edges to 0

    while there exists an augmenting path from source to sink:

        find the residual capacity along the path

        augment flow along the path

    return the maximum flow   }

Explanation:

• We initialize all flows to 0.
• We search for augmenting paths (using DFS or BFS).
• We add flow along the path until no more augmenting paths can be found.

Graph Example:

Let's consider a simple directed flow network where you want to find the maximum flow from the source $S$ to the sink $T$.

Steps:

• Initialize flow to 0.
• Find augmenting paths using DFS from $S$ to $T$. For instance, an augmenting path could be $S \to A \to B \to T$.
• Augment the flow along the path by the minimum capacity of edges on this path.
• Repeat until no more augmenting paths are found.

Key Points:

• Residual Graph:
  During each iteration, the algorithm works with a residual graph, which represents the remaining capacities of the edges after some flow has been pushed through the network. This residual graph allows the algorithm to track where more flow can be added and where flow can potentially be reduced.

• Integer Capacities:
  The Ford-Fulkerson algorithm works best for networks with integer capacities. If all capacities are integers, the algorithm guarantees to terminate in a finite number of iterations, as each augmenting path adds at least one unit of flow.

• Greedy Nature:
  Ford-Fulkerson is inherently a greedy algorithm. It looks for one augmenting path at a time and adds the maximum possible flow along that path without considering the entire network holistically in each iteration. Despite this, the algorithm guarantees finding the maximum flow.

• Time Complexity:
  The time complexity of Ford-Fulkerson depends on how augmenting paths are found. If we use Depth-First Search (DFS) to find augmenting paths, the algorithm's complexity is O(max_flow * E), where E is the number of edges and max_flow is the maximum possible flow in the network. The number of iterations can vary, especially for networks with irrational capacities, potentially leading to infinite loops. However, with integer capacities, the algorithm will always terminate.

Ford-Fulkerson is foundational to understanding network flow algorithms, and it serves as the base for more efficient algorithms like Edmonds-Karp, which improves the pathfinding mechanism

Section 2: Edmonds-Karp Algorithm

What is it?

The Edmonds-Karp Algorithm is a specific implementation of the Ford-Fulkerson method that uses Breadth-First Search (BFS) to find augmenting paths in a flow network. While Ford-Fulkerson can use either DFS or BFS, Edmonds-Karp improves the overall efficiency by choosing BFS to ensure that the shortest augmenting path (in terms of the number of edges) is found at each iteration. By finding the shortest paths, the algorithm reduces the number of iterations and provides a more predictable performance, particularly in large networks.

Edmonds-Karp is often preferred over the basic Ford-Fulkerson approach when working with larger or more complex networks because it systematically explores the network level by level, ensuring that it handles augmenting paths more efficiently.

How it works:

The key idea of Edmonds-Karp is the use of BFS instead of DFS to find augmenting paths, which changes how the algorithm explores the network. Here’s a step-by-step explanation of how the Edmonds-Karp algorithm operates:

1. Initialize Flow to 0
   Like Ford-Fulkerson, Edmonds-Karp starts with an initial flow of zero on all edges in the network.

2. Find Augmenting Paths Using Breadth-First Search (BFS)
   Instead of DFS, which explores paths as deep as possible, Edmonds-Karp uses BFS to find the shortest augmenting path between the source and the sink in terms of the number of edges. BFS starts from the source node and explores all nodes one level at a time, ensuring that the first augmenting path found is the one with the fewest edges.

3. Augment Flow Along the Shortest Path
   After finding an augmenting path using BFS, the algorithm identifies the minimum residual capacity (or bottleneck capacity) along the path and augments the flow by that value. The flow is added to all edges in the path, and the reverse flow is added to the residual graph to account for possible backflows in future iterations.

4. Repeat Until No More Augmenting Paths Exist
   The BFS process is repeated until there are no more augmenting paths from the source to the sink (i.e., BFS fails to find a path with available capacity). When no more augmenting paths can be found, the flow is maximized, and the algorithm terminates.

Pseudocode :

{

function EdmondsKarp(graph, source, sink):

    initialize flow in all edges to 0

    while BFS finds an augmenting path from source to sink:

        find the residual capacity of the path

        augment flow along the shortest path

    return the maximum flow  }

Explanation:

• Similar to Ford-Fulkerson but uses BFS to find the shortest augmenting path in terms of edge count.
• Flow is augmented until BFS can no longer find a path.

Graph Example:

Consider the same flow network as used in the Ford-Fulkerson example. Edmonds-Karp uses BFS to find the shortest augmenting paths.

Steps:

• Initialize flow to 0.
• Use BFS to find the shortest augmenting path from $S$ to $T$. For example, $S \to A \to B \to T$ might be the shortest path.
• Augment the flow along the path, and update the residual graph.
• Repeat until no more augmenting paths are found.

Key Differences from Ford-Fulkerson:

• Breadth-First Search (BFS) vs. Depth-First Search (DFS):
  The primary difference is the use of BFS in Edmonds-Karp instead of DFS. BFS ensures that the augmenting path found in each iteration is the shortest possible path in terms of the number of edges. This reduces the number of augmenting steps needed in cases where longer, less efficient paths would be explored with DFS.

• Shortest Augmenting Path:
  By always finding the shortest augmenting path, Edmonds-Karp avoids the problem of potentially inefficient long paths being explored first. This helps limit the number of iterations, especially for large networks, making the algorithm more predictable in terms of performance.

Time Complexity:

The time complexity of the Edmonds-Karp algorithm is O(VE²), where V is the number of vertices and E is the number of edges in the network. Here’s why:

• In each iteration, BFS is used to find an augmenting path, which takes O(E) time because BFS explores each edge at most once.
• In the worst case, the number of iterations is bounded by O(VE) because the number of augmenting paths is proportional to the number of edges, and the flow increment is minimized in each iteration.

Thus, the total time complexity is O(VE²), which is an improvement over Ford-Fulkerson’s potentially unbounded complexity when using DFS.

Comparison to Ford-Fulkerson:

• Predictability:
  Edmonds-Karp is more predictable and reliable than the DFS-based Ford-Fulkerson algorithm. With DFS, the time complexity can vary significantly depending on the structure of the graph and how augmenting paths are found. In contrast, using BFS ensures that Edmonds-Karp consistently finds the shortest paths and avoids the inefficiencies of longer paths.

• Performance on Large Graphs:
  For large, sparse networks, Edmonds-Karp tends to perform better than the basic Ford-Fulkerson method. This is because BFS focuses on minimizing the number of iterations by quickly identifying shorter paths, whereas DFS may explore longer, more complex paths that lead to slower convergence.

• Practical Use:
  In practice, Edmonds-Karp is often favored over the DFS-based Ford-Fulkerson, especially for cases where network size and edge capacity make the performance unpredictable using DFS.

Example:

Consider a simple graph where you need to compute the maximum flow from a source (S) to a sink (T).

• The network consists of 4 nodes: S, A, B, T.
• The capacities between the edges are as follows:
  • S → A: 3
  • S → B: 2
  • A → B: 1
  • A → T: 2
  • B → T: 3

Using BFS in Edmonds-Karp, the algorithm would first identify the shortest augmenting path, such as S → A → T with a bottleneck capacity of 2. Flow would be augmented along this path, reducing the residual capacity of edges S → A and A → T.

In the next iteration, BFS might find the path S → B → T, with a bottleneck capacity of 2, augmenting flow again. The process repeats until no more augmenting paths can be found.

This systematic process of finding the shortest paths and augmenting flow ensures that Edmonds-Karp maximizes flow efficiently, especially for large networks.

The Edmonds-Karp algorithm’s advantage lies in its ability to handle larger networks with a more predictable runtime, making it a reliable choice for network flow problems in various practical applications

Section 3: Push-Relabel Algorithm

What is it?

The Push-Relabel Algorithm is a fundamentally different approach to solving the maximum flow problem compared to the Ford-Fulkerson and Edmonds-Karp algorithms. Instead of focusing on finding augmenting paths, Push-Relabel works by locally manipulating the flow at each vertex to push excess flow through the network. The algorithm operates by "pushing" flow from one node to its neighbors when possible, and "relabeling" nodes to allow more flow to be pushed if the conditions permit.

Push-Relabel introduces the concept of preflow, where excess flow may accumulate at intermediate nodes (not just at the source and sink), and the goal is to gradually redistribute this excess flow to the sink, while respecting the capacity constraints.

How it works:

1. Initialize a Preflow
   In the Push-Relabel algorithm, instead of starting with zero flow like in Ford-Fulkerson, the algorithm begins by sending as much flow as possible from the source to its neighbors, saturating all outgoing edges. This initial state is called a preflow, where flow conservation is not strictly maintained at each node (meaning that nodes other than the source or sink may hold excess flow).

2. Push Excess Flow from Overflowing Vertices to Neighbors
   The algorithm then repeatedly pushes this excess flow from any vertex that has a surplus (i.e., more incoming flow than outgoing flow) to its neighboring vertices. A push is only allowed if the capacity between the two vertices hasn’t been fully used (i.e., there is still available residual capacity). This flow is "pushed" either forward (if residual capacity allows) or backward (if flow needs to be reduced).

3. Relabel Vertices to Maintain Feasibility
   If a vertex with excess flow has no neighbors to push to (i.e., all neighboring edges are fully saturated or cannot accommodate any more flow), the algorithm relabels the vertex. The idea of relabeling is to adjust the height of the vertex so that it becomes eligible to push flow to its neighbors. The height function ensures that flow moves downhill toward the sink, preventing cycles or incorrect flow direction. A vertex's height is increased to make it possible to push flow to lower-height neighbors.

4. Repeat Until No More Excess Flow Exists
   The process of pushing flow and relabeling vertices is repeated until there is no more excess flow at any vertex except the sink. At this point, the preflow becomes a valid maximum flow, and the algorithm terminates.

PseudoCode :

{

function PushRelabel(graph, source, sink):

    initialize preflow from source to all neighbors

    while there are active (overflowing) vertices:

        if vertex can push flow to a neighbor:

            push flow to neighbor

        else:

            relabel the vertex

    return the maximum flow }

Explanation:

• Preflows are pushed from the source.
• If no more flow can be pushed, the vertex is relabeled to adjust its height, allowing more flow to be pushed.
  

Graph Example:

Imagine a network where the Push-Relabel algorithm is applied. In this case, instead of augmenting paths, the algorithm pushes excess flow from overflowing vertices.

Steps:

• Initialize a preflow by saturating all edges from the source.
• Push excess flow from overflowing vertices to their neighbors (for instance, from $A$ to $B$).
• If a vertex cannot push its excess flow, relabel the vertex by increasing its height, allowing it to push flow in a new direction.
• Repeat until all excess flow is pushed to the sink.

Key Points:

• Excess Flow:
  In the Push-Relabel algorithm, a vertex has excess flow if the total incoming flow is greater than the outgoing flow. This excess flow needs to be redistributed by pushing it to neighboring vertices or eventually to the sink.

• Preflow:
  The algorithm begins by establishing a preflow, which violates the usual flow conservation property (where the sum of incoming and outgoing flows at a node is equal). Instead, nodes other than the source or sink may temporarily accumulate excess flow.

• Relabeling:
  To ensure that the flow moves toward the sink and does not get trapped at intermediate nodes, the algorithm assigns a height to each vertex. Initially, the source has the highest height. When a vertex has excess flow but cannot push it to any neighbors due to capacity constraints, it is relabelled by increasing its height, which allows it to push flow to lower-height neighbors.

• Flow Conservation:
  Although the preflow may temporarily violate flow conservation at intermediate nodes, the relabeling mechanism ensures that the flow is eventually directed toward the sink, maintaining feasibility.

Time Complexity:

The time complexity of the Push-Relabel algorithm is O(V²E), where V is the number of vertices and E is the number of edges in the graph. This makes it highly competitive, especially for dense graphs where the number of edges is large.

• V² comes from the fact that there can be at most V relabeling operations per vertex, and each push operation can occur up to V times for each edge.
• The algorithm is efficient in practice, especially for networks with many edges, because it avoids the need to repeatedly search for augmenting paths.

The Push-Relabel Algorithm offers a unique approach to solving the maximum flow problem by focusing on local adjustments rather than global pathfinding. Its efficiency in dense networks and structured approach to flow redistribution make it a powerful tool in network optimization tasks.

Comparison Between Algorithms

1. Efficiency

• Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm:

  • Time Complexity: O(max_flow * E)
  • Best-Case Scenario: Works well for networks with integer capacities. It’s efficient in smaller graphs or cases where the flow can be augmented significantly in fewer iterations.
  • Limitations: The time complexity can become inefficient for large networks or graphs with irrational capacities, as the number of iterations may become unbounded.

• Edmonds-Karp Algorithm:

  • Time Complexity: O(VE²), where V is the number of vertices and E is the number of edges.
  • Best-Case Scenario: Performs well in large, sparse networks where finding shorter paths through BFS reduces the number of augmenting iterations. The systematic nature of BFS leads to predictable performance.
  • Limitations: Although it improves predictability and efficiency over Ford-Fulkerson, it may not be as efficient in very dense graphs compared to Push-Relabel.

• Push-Relabel Algorithm:

  • Time Complexity: O(V²E)
  • Best-Case Scenario: Particularly effective for dense graphs where the number of edges is large compared to the number of vertices. Its local adjustments allow for efficient flow redistribution.
  • Limitations: While it’s competitive for dense graphs, it may require more overhead in terms of managing heights and pushing flow, making it less optimal for very sparse networks.

2. Use Cases

• Ford-Fulkerson Algorithm:

  • Real-World Applications:
    • Network Routing: Used in scenarios with simple network structures and relatively small sizes, such as certain telecommunications networks.
    • Bipartite Matching: Useful for problems like job assignments, where matching can be framed as a flow problem with integer capacities.
    • Transportation Networks: Effective in simpler models where direct paths and integer capacities are prevalent.

• Edmonds-Karp Algorithm:

  • Real-World Applications:
    • Data Networks: Often used in computer networks to optimize data flow, where the size and structure of the network can be large but relatively sparse.
    • Resource Allocation: Applied in operations research for optimizing resource distribution in large systems, such as supply chain logistics.
    • Transportation Planning: Effective in models that require minimizing cost and optimizing routes with various constraints.

• Push-Relabel Algorithm:

  • Real-World Applications:
    • Urban Traffic Management: Used in traffic flow optimization models where the road networks are dense with intersections and varying traffic conditions.
    • Wireless Sensor Networks: Effective for managing flow in communication networks where nodes frequently change and may hold excess data (e.g., in IoT applications).
    • Water Flow Management: Applied in hydraulic networks for managing water distribution systems where flow must be optimized across a dense network of pipes.

Summary

• Ford-Fulkerson is best suited for simple, small-scale applications where flows can be easily augmented.
• Edmonds-Karp excels in larger, sparse networks, providing a balance between complexity and efficiency through its use of BFS for finding augmenting paths.
• Push-Relabel is optimal for dense graphs, allowing for efficient local flow adjustments and the handling of excess flow at nodes.

Choosing the right algorithm often depends on the specific characteristics of the network being analyzed, such as size, density, and the nature of the flow constraints. Each algorithm has its strengths and weaknesses, making them suitable for different applications across various fields.

👋 How Did You Like This Blog?

Please give us your feedback!